Source # | 11735 |
Other Sources |
|
Entered by | dr.unclear | ||
Checksums | shn-md5 , st5 | ||
Disc Counts | 2 / 2 | ||
Media Size | |||
Date Circulated
Date Added |
08/30/02 09/15/2002 |
||
Source Summary | SBD> MC> PCM> DAT> CD; With aud patches; See info file for details; Missing both encores; via Kevin Gills; Seeded to etree by Willy; note wavs have pre-emphasis, so files should ideally be burned to audio with PRE flag set (see user comments) |
Other Sources (comments) flac16; Recording... (0) flac16;... (0) flac24; Source:... (0) flac16/48kHz; Source... (0) |
|||
Date | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|
08/30/2002 | darrin |
Another PCM-sourced show -- I do not have this recording, but want to suggest that somebody who does conduct listening tests to determine whether these shns have pre-emphasis applied and need to be burned with the emphasis flag set for each track. Almost all PCM-sourced recordings have pre-emphasis applied, and if the PCM was digitally transfered to DAT and then digitally transferred to shn, the pre-emphasis will still be applied to the digital signal, but the electronic "flag" telling a cd player to apply de-emphasis on playback will be lost. A recording with pre-emphasis encoded, but not decoded will sound artificially bright (similar to how a cassette recorded with dolby, but played back without dolby would sound). Feurio! allows one to manually set emphasis flags when burning disks. Subcode information regarding whether pre-emphasis was initially applied (it's applied before the initial a>d and de-emphasis is applied after d>a if the subcode's present) is LOST when a pcm/dat/cdr is converted to a wav (and subsequently compressed as a shn/flac). If anybody does conduct this experiment on this or on any other PCM-sourced show, PLEASE post your results so others may benefit :) |